header image






 

Jason Statham In Crank 2

4d28dd73ff2a5c3f0a4904f92612d1a0


FavoriteLoadingAdd to favorites


Related Posts

~ by FreshHotness on May 14, 2009.

11 Responses to “Jason Statham In Crank 2”

  1. WHY IS HIS JUNK BLURRED.

    Goddamn it.

    Still yay.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    [Reply]

  2. Ok I was already planning on seeing this movie but now I’ve got a hard on for it.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    [Reply]

  3. wow… even with the blurs, wow..

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    [Reply]

  4. So… is this blurry in the movies?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    [Reply]

  5. I want his cock so bad!

    Here you all go, enjoy!

    http://www.metacafe.com/watch/2733994/amy_smart_funny_crank_2_sex_scene/

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    [Reply]

  6. yeah, it’s blurred even in the movie. Since the movie was quite shitty on top of that, it turned out to be a very bit waste of 9 bucks

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    [Reply]

  7. Still, that’s one lucky bitch.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    [Reply]

  8. Jason Statham is a man’s man and I’ve always had the hots for him since the Transporter. This fucker knows how to fuck and is damn proud of it. Too bad there’s no way for me to get in his pants cause I’d be having him fucking me in more ways than what’s posted here LOL

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    [Reply]

  9. so hot. im gonna have to go buy this movie now when it comes out on dvd. lets pray that an unrated version comes out.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    [Reply]

  10. check this out
    I found it on another website
    looks like his cock on that xray, but it can be anybody that actually took the xray

    http://www.bsxds.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/crancks-cock.jpg

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    [Reply]

  11. do you have any unblurred photos?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    [Reply]