Fresh Hotness

22 Responses to “MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann Owns John McCain In An Epic Way”

1. Keith Olbermann is a far left nut job. McCain did make sense. We’re still in Germany, Japan, etc. Does it take a brain exercise to understand that? Can we just look at dick here and not have to get the ridiculous slobber that comes out of closet case Olbermann’s mouth??? Ridiculous to post that crap on here.

   Like or Dislike: 0  0

   [Reply]

   Todd said this on June 13th, 2008 at 3:42 am

2. Oh dear, a gay republican. How pathetic. No, John didn’t make sense. Yes, we’re still in Germany, South Korea, and other countries. But the point is, those countries aren’t unsafe places for the troops to be, so we’re not risking much by keeping them there long term. Iraq is unstable, so comparing it to those countries makes no sense. But clearly all of that went completely over your head.

   And secondly, if you want to just look at dick, why did you even bother watching this eleven minute video, or waste your time commenting? You could’ve just kept scrolling, and kept looking at dick.

   Like or Dislike: 0  0

   [Reply]

   James said this on June 13th, 2008 at 6:16 am

3. Dear Todd,

   You’re a total idiot. You either didn’t watch the video, didn’t listen to a word Olbermann said, or as retarded and heartless as McCain. It’s people like you who cause war out of ignorance. Idiot.

   -Age

   Like or Dislike: 0  0

   [Reply]

   Ageman20XX said this on June 13th, 2008 at 9:53 am

4. Those countries are safe b/c we are there. Duh!

   Like or Dislike: 0  0

   [Reply]

   Todd said this on June 13th, 2008 at 6:51 pm

5. Are you really that dense? That logic makes no sense. Iraq is not safe. We are there. Afghanistan is not safe. We are there. How is us being there a guarantee of safety? Please tell me you’re not registered to vote.

   Like or Dislike: 0  0

   [Reply]

   James said this on June 13th, 2008 at 7:11 pm

6. You just said we are still in Germany, South Korea, etc. And those places are safe. They are safe b/c we are there. Maybe you are dense. I’d hate to have somebody like you in charge after WWII or any other war. We’d have messes all over the world today if that was the case.

   And it’s amazing that to be gay means you have to be a pacifist social liberal or otherwise there’s something wrong with you. No, what’s wrong is being gay and automatically signing up with a party that is bad for America and not having the balls to stand up for what’s needed in the world for fear of being labled. I don’t fear your kind. I think you’re pathetic and not a very good debater.. especially when you can’t even follow your own previous post.

   Like or Dislike: 0  0

   [Reply]

   Todd said this on June 13th, 2008 at 9:16 pm

7. Did you even watch the video? The whole point is that John McCain claims we’re going to be in Iraq indefinitely, but that’s not important–what’s important is the casualties, because we’re also in other places like South Korea. You can’t compare Iraq to South Korea because one is stable, the other isn’t. The surge is not working, and there is no end in sight. How long will it take for Iraq to become stable? He says he’s okay with being there 100 years. People like you are the reason soldiers have and will continue to die for an unjust war. I hope you’re satisfied with having their blood on your hands when you cast your vote for John McCain this Fall.

   Like or Dislike: 0  0

   [Reply]

   Alexis said this on June 13th, 2008 at 9:35 pm

8. The surge is working. If Republicans had balls like Truman, this would have been all over, oh about 5 years ago. Carpet bombing can do wonders.

   I can’t imagine how you people would have ever mentally survived back in the 1940’s. Didn’t we lose more troops storming the beaches of Normandy than all of the Iraq war so far? The dirty truth is you liberals aren’t worried about troop deaths, you worried about being a good liberal and looking good around the world. You just use troop deaths as a scapegoat. It’s disgusting. You’re the same ones that spit on the troops when they came home after Vietman. The only difference is this time around your learned your lesson that that didn’t go over to well with the public.

   You all are fools if you think Obama is going to remove troops. During one of the debates he talked about invading Pakistan. Kool-aid drinkers, jeez…

   Like or Dislike: 0  0

   [Reply]

   Todd said this on June 13th, 2008 at 9:51 pm

9. you’re
   you
   too

   Like or Dislike: 0  0

   [Reply]

   Todd said this on June 13th, 2008 at 9:53 pm

10. wow, so this guy’s an asshole, an idiot AND a racist huh? let’s give this jackass a gold star.

    i think it’s quite apparent that Mr. Todd didn’t take the time to watch this video. or at least i HOPE he didn’t view this video and make such comments. anyone with a moral compass and any amount of fortitude would be right on with what Oblermann was saying. i think he speaks for most Americans at the moment. too many young men and women are dying for no reason – and NOBODY knows why. perhaps if Mr. Todd could serve a term or two, he wouldn’t be so swift to throw around his mindless statements. but then again, he sits on the luxury of making them from the comfort of his home. he complains about the fact that Fresh Hotness is bringing politics to the website, yet he seems to be a wellspring of political jiberish. such a shame.

    now, i’m going to finish masturbating to the hot guy gagging in the video above this one. thank you.

    Like or Dislike: 0  0

    [Reply]

    charles said this on June 14th, 2008 at 2:24 am

11. Wow. Who is this guy in the video. Cos he’s an idiot. In his (so incredibly full of himself) rant about context, that’s the one thing he forgot himself. All these many speeches from eons ago before this farce of a war started, when EVERYONE actually believed that it would be relatively easy and that it wouldn’t turn into another vietnam. To try and use these to make Sen. McCain look like some mad man is completely ridiculus. He is a journalist and if he wants any respect he should present ALL the facts, not just the ones that make him sound clever.

    Also if he doesn’t want to get blown up by a terrorist who came from an Iraq that became debilitated by the sudden withdraw of troops (where everyone now hates the USA more because they only did a half arsed job and have made their lives worse) he should encourage his candidate to have a more realistic view of the current situation in Iraq. Time is the only way that this war will end peacefully. If you idiots can’t learn from your previous mistakes in Korea and Vietnam, by not starting another pointless war against people who believe something different to you. Then you should hopefully realise that you shouldn’t make the second mistake and pull out early (when you finally realise that it may be hard). You have started it, now you need to finish it properly for any hope of a more stable middle east.

    Yes I am aware that your young men and women are dying in Iraq. But it is now time for you to realise that this is what the majority of Americans wanted before it started and you have to collectively take responsibility for your actions. I think that it is a shame that you all think that an American life is worth more than an Iraqi life now it has become harder for you. These people are living in terror each day and are witnessing their loved ones die in front of their eyes every day. I think you now need to show these people some respect and finish what you started – and give them the better life you promised when you started this invasion. If you do not deliver what you promised and give these people the peaceful life they deserve, then they have every reason to turn to extremism and you will have no right to argue against it. If you pull out now, it may feel easier and less painful, but it will be just like North Korea and you will find thet the future will be harder to deal with.

    You have a brain. Now is the time to use it and not follow this popular trend of get out of Iraq, jump off the band wagon and stand up for what is right for the world, not just for you.

    Like or Dislike: 0  0

    [Reply]

    Graham (in the UK) said this on June 14th, 2008 at 6:58 am

12. At Todd, Wake up and look at whats going on in the world. America needs to heal itself before you can claim to do the same to the world.
    And carpet bombing, nice, just nice… This is why most of the world considers Americans to be popmus egotistical gun toting maniacs.

    Like or Dislike: 0  0

    [Reply]

    Fder said this on June 14th, 2008 at 2:26 pm

13. Graham – I couldn’t agree more. Very well put. We started it, we must finish it. I’m a true conservative and was against going to war on day 1. I don’t believe we have any right to invade other countries, etc. I do think there were issues in Iraq that were left over from the Persian Gulf War and should have been settled at that time. If we were going to invade any country, I wish it had been Pakistan, since that is where Osama has been rumored to be for the last several years.

    I don’t agree with the premise that we are the reason so many Iraqis have died. We’re not out killing Iraqis, we are after the terrorists.

    The one point that I don’t get from the far left is why didn’t you all condemn Bush after 9/11 when he clearly said numerous times… “we will go after terrorists and THOSE THAT HARBOR THEM”. As soon as I heard that line the first time I knew what it meant. Liberals just stood around shaking in fear after 9/11 and let Bush say and do what he wanted, now they are complaining.

    And to Fder: You might want to wake up yourself and realize this is the country most of the world wants to be like, wants to come to, etc. I don’t really care if they think we are gun toting. They need us. They want to be us. The one on top is always hated in political speak.

    But Graham really hit this home in pointing out that we are at a point where we HAVE to finish the job, regardless of how it started. You can’t invade a country and then leave a mess b/c our troops have died. And like I said before, it’s not the troop deaths that bother the left, it’s actually exactly what Fder just said that bothers the libs…. worrying over what the rest of the world thinks of us.

    Like or Dislike: 0  0

    [Reply]

    Todd said this on June 14th, 2008 at 8:37 pm

14. To Todd by the use of such blatant racially motivated puns, negates any and all valid political points of view. I am not surprise but sadden by your maladaptive cultural awareness. I really don’t think that the Kool Aid industries would be the global success that it if only members of one ethnic group where its sole consumers. To be a conservative does not equate to being a racist. Please be aware of with ones intentions and not hide behind the guise of one political affiliation. Luv ya.. None kool aid drinking man of a Beautiful color

    Global Gay Community Unite… The Time is Now!!

    Like or Dislike: 0  0

    [Reply]

    A lover of haters :) said this on June 14th, 2008 at 10:17 pm

15. OMG…. only a leftist out in la la land would consider “Kool-aid” racist. Do you not even know what that means? OMG again! I’m about to fall out of my chair.

    Ok, so let me get this straight. All the time people have been calling Obama followers “Kool-aid drinkers”, there’s actually a sector of people out there that thinks it is a reference to black people drinking Kool-aid and that people are being racist by using that comment? That just shows how nutty liberals are. Um, I can’t believe I actually have to explain this. The term “Kool-aid drinker” is a reference to a blind follower. It became a common phrase to describe dopes being led around by a false leader b/c JIM JONES CONVINCED OVER 900 PEOPLE TO COMMIT SUICIDE BY DRINKING A POISONED TYPE KOOL-AID DRINK!!!!!!! So therefore, when people are being like sheep led to the slaughter house by some cult type leader, sometimes people will call them “Kool-aid drinkers”. In turn, people also say things like “don’t drink the Kool-aid” when referring to people listening to a line of BS.

    Wow. Can’t believe I just had to explain that.

    Like or Dislike: 0  0

    [Reply]

    Todd said this on June 15th, 2008 at 12:28 am

16. Post this in your browser. This is why the world would be a better place if everyone read Calvin And Hobbes.

    http://flyingfarther.files.wordpress.com/2007/09/124173_howcomeweplaywar_11.jpg

    Like or Dislike: 0  0

    [Reply]

    Graham (in the UK) said this on June 15th, 2008 at 6:38 am

17. I laughed as I read this because I thought of all the penises that went flaccid.

    Like or Dislike: 0  0

    [Reply]

    Robert said this on June 15th, 2008 at 9:13 am

18. Dear Todd,

    why dont you get your faggot ass to iraq and fight in the war. Ive been there myself and it is pointless. Im ready to go again. God bless all the faggot republicans who uses their voices instead of theirselves to fight for this country. Its nothing like getting shot at everyday!! So todd, go ahead and sign up at the nearest recruiting office, I want to fight for this country together.

    Like or Dislike: 0  0

    [Reply]

    brant said this on June 15th, 2008 at 10:53 am

19. To graham from the Pussy UK,

    are any of you fags in the military?? you cant say anything about IRAQ if you dont see people you know get hurt or die everyday! WHY DONT YOU FAGS JUST SHUT YOUR MOUTHS!! AND DO something right for your country and start fighting for it.. instead of being protected by BRAVE men and women who actually FIGHT, while you are in your homes safely. I think every able person should have to go fight in a war just so people like todd and graham know what we go through. Fags, always using their mouths for everything..boohoo

    Like or Dislike: 0  0

    [Reply]

    brant said this on June 15th, 2008 at 11:04 am

20. brent or brant or whatever your faggity name is… Like I said in my post, I’m all for carpet bombing. I think it’s foolish to put in ground troops, but you weak kneed liberals think it’s horrible to carpet bomb, so our troops get wasted away.

    You haven’t been to Iraq. You’ve never fought in any battle. No real troop would come on here and bash the only 2 sane posters on this entire thread. Now go back to being a ho!

    Like or Dislike: 0  0

    [Reply]

    Todd said this on June 16th, 2008 at 4:54 am

21. Olberman is a blowhard. If you don’t understand what McCain meant you are blinded by your politics.

    Like or Dislike: 0  0

    [Reply]

    gay for hillary/mccain said this on June 19th, 2008 at 2:15 am

22. I didn’t vote for McCain, I voted for Obama actually, but it’s douchebags like Olbermann that make liberals everywhere look bad. I am a CNN man, myself. The braindead drivel on MSNBC is no better than the bullshit that they spout off about on Faux News. It’s partisanship at it’s worst. And the fact that you guys jump in line behind this toolbag is really sad.

    And also, are you guys really commenting in a GAY BLOG calling eachother fags? =\

    Like or Dislike: 0  0

    [Reply]

    YouAreAllSad said this on February 2nd, 2009 at 2:29 pm