Don’t give him the attention. He sued some rag for defamation over claiming evidence that he’s gay, so he’s either a homophobe or a closet case, or both. His action is bad for us either way, unless he’s rightly laughed out of court.
Yeah he’s serious, but I thought he WON that case and then Peter Tachell tried to get him to donate the money to a GLBT charity — because in the run of this case it did send the message that to be called gay is damaging which is heterosexist bull — and he declined so he kept that money.
- from Wikipedia:
“Williams won a libel case against MGN and Northern & Shell in December 2005 relating to articles which had reported he was a closet homosexual.[129] In the libel action that resulted from this, Williams accepted substantial damages and the publishers accepted that the stories were untrue. His counsel, Tom Shields QC, told the court: “Mr Williams is not, and has never been, homosexual”. Gay rights campaigner Peter Tatchell called for any damages paid out from the libel case to be donated to gay charities, claiming Williams’ legal actions had created the impression that it is “bad to be gay”.[130] Williams retorted that he was not bothered about being labelled as a gay man, and he would have taken the same action had it been regarding a heterosexual relationship. The court case has led some to draw comparisons between Williams and Australian actor/pop star Jason Donovan, who also once made a successful libel claim against a publication concerning his sexuality. Donovan won the case, but the act of his litigation alienated many of his gay fans.”
Exhibitionist much?
But hawt.
I’d hit that.
Dean said this on January 1st, 2008 at 7:13 pm
Don’t give him the attention. He sued some rag for defamation over claiming evidence that he’s gay, so he’s either a homophobe or a closet case, or both. His action is bad for us either way, unless he’s rightly laughed out of court.
Andy said this on January 1st, 2008 at 8:15 pm
What the shit. Are you serious?
Dean said this on January 2nd, 2008 at 12:12 am
Yeah he’s serious, but I thought he WON that case and then Peter Tachell tried to get him to donate the money to a GLBT charity — because in the run of this case it did send the message that to be called gay is damaging which is heterosexist bull — and he declined so he kept that money.
- from Wikipedia:
“Williams won a libel case against MGN and Northern & Shell in December 2005 relating to articles which had reported he was a closet homosexual.[129] In the libel action that resulted from this, Williams accepted substantial damages and the publishers accepted that the stories were untrue. His counsel, Tom Shields QC, told the court: “Mr Williams is not, and has never been, homosexual”. Gay rights campaigner Peter Tatchell called for any damages paid out from the libel case to be donated to gay charities, claiming Williams’ legal actions had created the impression that it is “bad to be gay”.[130] Williams retorted that he was not bothered about being labelled as a gay man, and he would have taken the same action had it been regarding a heterosexual relationship. The court case has led some to draw comparisons between Williams and Australian actor/pop star Jason Donovan, who also once made a successful libel claim against a publication concerning his sexuality. Donovan won the case, but the act of his litigation alienated many of his gay fans.”
SeaFlood said this on January 2nd, 2008 at 4:46 pm
[...] what you might call ‘an ode to ass’. And you need to go ‘ere. They did all the hard work for [...]
Now let’s look at loads of pictures of Robbie Williams’s arse. Oh okay. said this on January 4th, 2008 at 5:37 am
Damn, he has a hot ass!!
RYan~ said this on January 10th, 2008 at 7:51 pm
nice ass
Aaron said this on June 20th, 2008 at 10:36 pm
It would be interesting to know details
Dominica said this on November 6th, 2008 at 12:17 am